Choosing between a Fiber laser and a CO₂ laser for engraving can be confusing — especially when different materials require different wavelengths, temperatures, and absorption rates. This guide provides a full material-by-material comparison, backed by real factory-tested engraving parameters from both Fiber (800W / 1200W) and CO₂ (80W / 130W) systems.
This is not a “generic comparison.” Every data point in this article comes directly from actual GWEIKE engraving tables, including:
- 800W Fiber engraving (Stainless / Carbon Steel / Aluminum / Brass)
- 1200W Fiber engraving (same materials)
- 80W CO₂ engraving (Acrylic, MDF, Leather, Wood, Cloth, Rubber, PVC*)
- 130W CO₂ engraving (same materials)
The result is a practical guide that tells you, with real numbers: “Which laser works best for which material—and why?”
Fast Answer: Which Laser for Which Materials?
If you need a quick recommendation, this table summarizes 90% of real-world use cases:
| Material Type | Recommended Laser | Typical Depth | Example Parameter (from your tables) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stainless Steel | Fiber | 0.05 mm | 800W: 16–33% power, 800 mm/s, 5–6 bar | High contrast, fast marking |
| Carbon Steel | Fiber | 0.05 mm | 800W: 16–33% power, -1 focus | Same process window as stainless |
| Aluminum | Fiber | 0.05 mm | 800W: 33–43% power | High-reflection → needs more power |
| Brass | Fiber | 0.05 mm | 800W: 33–43% power | Same as aluminum, strong heat transfer |
| Acrylic | CO₂ | 0.1–3.0 mm | 80W: 12–40% power, 1–2 bar | Deep engraving up to 3 mm |
| MDF / Plywood | CO₂ | 0.1–3.0 mm | 80W: 12–40% power | More smoke → requires air assist |
| Leather / Cloth | CO₂ | 0.1–1.0 mm | 80W: 12–26% power | Soft organic material → low power needed |
| Rubber Stamp Board | CO₂ | 0.5–1.0 mm | 80W: 22–26% power | Perfect vertical walls at slower speed |
Fiber vs CO₂: How the Light Interacts With Materials
Wavelength & Absorption
| Laser Type | Wavelength | Best Absorbed By | Poorly Absorbed By |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber Laser | ~1064 nm | Metals (Stainless, CS, Aluminum, Brass) | Acrylic, wood, leather (mostly transparent) |
| CO₂ Laser | 10.6 μm | Organic materials (Wood, Acrylic, Leather, Rubber) | Bare metals |
Engraving Depth Differences
| Laser Type | Typical Engraving Depth | Based on Your Data |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber (800W/1200W) | 0.02–0.05 mm | All materials in your table use 0.05 mm |
| CO₂ (80W/130W) | 0.1–3.0 mm | Acrylic/MDF/Wood tables cover 0.1–3.0 mm |
Metals: Fiber Laser Dominates (With Real Data)
Metal is where Fiber completely outperforms CO₂. Below is the breakdown using your real numbers.
Stainless Steel Engraving
| Laser Power | Engraving Depth | Power (%) | Nozzle Height | Focus | Pressure | High Speed | Best Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 800W Fiber | 0.05 mm | 16–33% | 5 mm | -1 | 5–6 bar | 800 mm/s | 400 mm/s |
| 1200W Fiber | 0.05 mm | 14–23% | 5 mm | -1 | 5–6 bar | 800 mm/s | 400 mm/s |
Key takeaway: 1200W achieves the same engraving depth using 14–23%, compared to 16–33% on 800W — a noticeably larger process window and better long-run stability.
Carbon Steel (Same Window)
The parameters for carbon steel are identical to stainless steel, confirming high consistency in shallow metal marking.
Aluminum & Brass: High-Reflection Materials
| Laser Power | Material | Depth | Power (%) | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 800W Fiber | Aluminum | 0.05 mm | 33–43% | 800/400 mm/s |
| 1200W Fiber | Aluminum | 0.05 mm | 20–33% | 800/400 mm/s |
| 800W Fiber | Brass | 0.05 mm | 33–43% | 800/400 mm/s |
| 1200W Fiber | Brass | 0.05 mm | 20–33% | 800/400 mm/s |
Here the difference is dramatic: high-reflection materials require up to 43% power on 800W, but only 33% on 1200W. This is one of the strongest arguments for upgrading power.
Non-Metals: CO₂ Laser Engraving (Full 0.1–3.0 mm Data)
This is where your CO₂ engraving tables shine. With real depth-power curves, we can build a fully data-backed guide.
Acrylic Engraving Settings (80W & 130W)
Acrylic is one of the cleanest materials to engrave with a CO₂ laser. Here’s the full depth–power mapping from your table:
| Depth | 80W Power (%) | 130W Power (%) | Speed | Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 mm | 12–14% | 10–12% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 0.2 mm | 14–16% | 12–14% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 0.5 mm | 22–24% | 18–20% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 1.0 mm | 24–26% | 20–22% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 2.0 mm | 30–35% | 25–30% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 3.0 mm | 35–40% | 30–35% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
Observations:
- Power increases almost linearly with depth.
- 130W uses noticeably lower power % at the same depth.
- Even at full 3 mm depth, the power stays under 40%.
MDF (High-Density Board)
MDF settings mirror acrylic closely, but the material burns more easily. Here is your MDF table, exactly as provided:
| Depth | 80W Power (%) | 130W Power (%) | Speed | Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 mm | 12–14% | 10–12% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 0.2 mm | 14–16% | 12–14% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 0.5 mm | 22–24% | 18–20% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 1.0 mm | 24–26% | 20–22% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 2.0 mm | 30–35% | 25–30% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 3.0 mm | 35–40% | 30–35% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
Leather Engraving (0.1–1.0 mm)
| Depth | 80W Power (%) | 130W Power (%) | Speed | Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 mm | 12–14% | 10–12% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 0.2 mm | 14–16% | 12–14% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 0.5 mm | 22–24% | 18–20% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
| 1.0 mm | 24–26% | 20–22% | 800/400 mm/s | 1–2 bar |
Leather behaves similarly to MDF at shallow depths but burns more easily.
Wood (Except Rare Hardwoods)
This table is identical to MDF, meaning you can reuse the same engraving curve.
Cloth, Rubber Board, Paper
These materials absorb CO₂ extremely well, making them ideal for high-speed engraving at relatively low power settings.
| Material | Depth | 80W Power (%) | 130W Power (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloth | 0.1–0.5 mm | 12–24% | 10–20% | Very fast vaporization, low power needed |
| Rubber Board | 0.1–1.0 mm | 12–26% | 10–22% | Ideal for stamp making |
| Paper | 0.1 mm | 12–14% | 10–12% | Same as cloth |
PVC (Not Recommended)
Your table includes PVC values (same as cloth/paper), but PVC produces chlorine gases when lasered. We include the data for completeness but strongly recommend avoiding PVC in any real project. For safety reasons, please refer to our PVC guidelines before cutting any plastics. If you’re unsure whether your material is PVC, check our identification tips.
Special Cases Where Both Lasers Work
Anodized Aluminum
Fiber engraves into the metal. CO₂ removes the dye layer only.
Painted or Powder-Coated Metals
CO₂ can remove coatings cleanly. Fiber can mark through the coating into the metal.
Choosing the Right Laser by Application
If you engrave mostly non-metals:
CO₂ is the correct choice (acrylic, MDF, leather, rubber).
If you engrave metals:
Fiber is required (stainless steel, carbon steel, aluminum, brass).
If you engrave both:
The best solution is a multi-process machine or a combination of Fiber + CO₂.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ Schema Ready)
Can a CO₂ laser engrave stainless steel?
CO₂ lasers are not the primary choice for steel, but with oxygen-assist, they can effectively cut 2 mm mild steel when needed. See below for setup instructions.
Can a Fiber laser engrave acrylic or wood?
No. These materials are transparent to 1064 nm fiber wavelength.
How deep can CO₂ engrave?
Up to 3 mm based on your acrylic/MDF/wood tables (at 35–40% power on 80W).
Is Fiber faster on metals?
Yes. Your tables show 800 mm/s high-speed mode on 800W & 1200W.
Need Material-Specific Settings?
See our full engraving parameter guides for each material (Acrylic, Wood, Leather, Stainless Steel, etc.).